Thursday 7 March 2013

More pollution for Gladstone, Queensland following oil shale processing development

Thanks to Denis Wilson of the Southern Highlands of NSW and The Nature of Robertson for drawing my attention to this Media Statement from the Queensland Government regarding Oil Shale.  I would ask Networkers to read the material at the link I have inserted. As Denis points out in his comments - and the linked article does too - there are real causes for concern.  Denis comments:

Queensland Government is determined to take their State back to the Dark Ages.

Oil Shale was the very earliest oil industry in Australia - several operations here in NSW Southern Highlands, at Joadja and Welby in the late 1800s.

Those operations were closed down early, because the project was inefficient and dirty. No doubt they will tell us that the new extraction processes are much smarter than the old ones.

But then again, it sounds a lot like the operations in the Marcellus Shale in the USA. And we all know how disastrous that is turning out to be.

Please spread the word.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Further to Denis's comments above and the Media Statements below, Miss Eagle finds it interesting to compare the locations of oil shale deposits and the Great Artesian Basin.  Miss Eagle wonders what questions governments or local communities may ask themselves with regard to this feature of interest.




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Media Statements

JOINT STATEMENT

Minister for Environment and Heritage Protection
The Honourable Andrew Powell

Minister for Natural Resources and Mines
The Honourable Andrew Cripps

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Newman Government approves oil shale industry


The creation of new jobs and broad economic benefits are expected, following the Newman Government announcement that it will allow the development of a commercial oil shale industry in Queensland under strict environmental conditions.
Natural Resources and Mines Minister, Andrew Cripps, said the Government’s new oil shale policy sets rigorous environmental controls on the industry and will allow existing oil shale operator QER Limited to progress its trial plant at Gladstone to commercial stage.
“Queensland currently has around 90 per cent of Australia’s known oil shale resources, which are equivalent to approximately 22 billion barrels of oil,” Mr Cripps said.
“As the world supply of conventional crude oil diminishes, there are strong prospects for oil shale to become the next major source of liquid fuel supplies in Australia, and Queensland is well placed to lead that charge.
“The industry has the potential to create thousands of new jobs in the construction phase alone, and provide royalties and other economic benefits for our regional communities and the broader economy, which is great news for Queensland.”
Minister Cripps said the new oil shale policy would:
  • recognise the strategic importance of oil shale to contribute to energy security, and encourage private sector investment in high quality oil shale extracting technologies
  • ensure project proponents must first demonstrate their oil shale technology will meet high environmental standards and community expectations
  • allow, in general, the consideration and development of other oil shale deposits in Queensland, pending thorough environmental assessment on a project by project basis
  • continue the existing 20-year moratorium suspending development of the McFarlane oil shale deposit near Proserpine until 2028
Minister for Environment and Heritage Protection, Andrew Powell, emphasised that strict environmental controls would apply to any proposal to mine and process oil shale.
“To date, there has been extremely limited commercial application of oil shale in Australia and overseas,” Mr Powell said.
“That’s why any proposed oil shale development will be subject to detailed environmental assessments on a project-by-project basis. 
“We will consider these proposals on their merits and require a trial stage to determine the feasibility and environmental performance of any unproven technologies.
“The approval process for any oil shale development will demand that operators adopt best practice environmental management techniques and comprehensive monitoring of the process, its emissions, wastes and impact on the community and environmental settings.
“Under the new policy, existing operator Queensland Energy Resources Ltd (QER) will be able to proceed directly to commercial production, but new entrants to the industry will need to prove their oil shale extraction technologies through trials.
“Importantly, both existing and new operators in the oil shale industry will need to prepare full Environmental Impact Statements for their projects.”
Mr Powell said the QER pilot plant near Gladstone has successfully demonstrated the viability of its processing technology.
“The report into the QER plant demonstrated it operated well within the environmental performance requirements of its Environmental Authority issued by my department,” he said.
13 February 2013
Further Information:
Oil shale is a fine grained sedimentary rock containing organic matter called kerogen. It is a completely different industry and extraction process to shale gas or shale oil.
Hydrocarbons are derived from oil shale that has been mined and then heated in a processing plant.  This process produces vapours which are condensed and converted into synthetic crude oil, and then refined to produce ultra-low sulphur transport fuels.


2 comments:

  1. Glad you have picked this up.
    There is so much happening at the moment.
    Hard to keep across it all.
    Cheers
    Denis

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Denis, I haven't done a lot of work on the Lock the Gate campaign and CSG - simply because they appear to be so well organised that I consider my time better spent on less organised or less heard of campaigns. However, I do agree. Things are going from worse to awful - and it is hard to keep across it all. Only money counts it seems - not the Australian landscape and environment nor the welfare of its people. I think of the Nationalist art and literature of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. What would those artists and writers say to all this if they were around to-day?

      Delete

This blog does not take Anonymous comments. Experience shows that comments cluttered with "Anonymous" are boring and people don't know whether "Anonymous" is one person or many. This is not a decision about freedom of speech. It is a decision about boring or unwillingness to be known by even a pseudonym.

Total Pageviews